Talking to a strategist-Triangular frame of tactical methods-war is not law!
 Talking to a strategist-Triangular frame of tactical methods-war is not law!

By Essa Bokarr Sey.

 Listen to me Commander-in-Chief! Listen very carefully!

There is this strategy called the triangular frame of tactical methods! It is where the powerful monster is at the apex of things whereas the little fighters are occupying the the two bases opposite each other at the bottom. What happens here commander? The apex is all alone over looking the fighters at the base. They may argue, quarrel or frown at each other before the real war against the apex starts BUT! as soon as the real war starts these elements regroup to hit the apex. This is why real thinkers say the most effective method of change starts from bottom-top not from top-bottom.

Look at the following formular before analyzing the hidden part of the concept helping shape this message and its contents.

Formular A:-Quantity X of inanimate items versus Quality Y of animate performers. What does this mean?

Here is a list of arms and ammos(inanimate items FA-X)

M16-10 containers,

AK47-10 containers.

Ammo cases-50 containers.

MAB Pistols-20 containers.

Mass 36 Rilfes-10 containers.                                        

Rocket propelled grenades-10 containers.

Rocket launchers-10 containers.

Lets do the math here... all in all we have 120 containers of useful and deadly weapons! These weapons are not living things but they can determine the fate of living things. They are manufactured and sold. What buys them? Money, loyalty and/or signed bonds.

Next lets look at the following list.

Formular B:-Quality Y of animate performers versus Quantity X of inanimate items. What does this mean?

Here is a list of men and women of existing fighters, new intakes and/or reserves,(animate performers FA-Y)

New intakes-500 men and women.

Old guards in uniform-300 men and women.

Active in service-2000 men and women.

Ready to be enlisted-100,000 able bodied youths.

 

Lets do the math here and see...we have all in all 2,800 who can at least be asked to rush and open the containers right away.

We also have at least 100,000 who could be forced by nationalism to pick up a rifle or pistol therefore defend the integrity of the nation where raison d'etre is not abused. Good job raison d'etre!

What is the challenge now? That’s a good question to ask ourselves  and him the commander-in-chief?

The challenge is called PEACE! War is not the challenge here because it does not care! War jumps in then burns,detroys and it does not explain anything to anyone! War is an obstacle in flames!

How can one we solve the equation with formular FA-X versus

FA-Y multiplied by raison d'etre?

Solution is simple:-WE BUY ARMS BUT WE DO NOT BUY FIGHTERS WE TRAIN FIGHTERS OR DEFENDERS OF THE FRONTIERS!

Now look at the above and see why arms are not the answer, neither is force the raison d'etre.

Special forces are best when they win hearts and minds!

Now look here war is not law...war is war, law is law. Can we mix the two? Yes we can but not always.

Lets take a balad with critical thinking therefore look deep inside the meaning of this conversation between instincts and raison d'etre. There are parameters to set aside whenever social justice expects to use certain variables while downloading the meaning or meanings of raison d'etre from a societal perspective. This is exactly why we cannot dispute the fact that noise is not choice. Neither is choice noise. The two are set aside to represent the meaning of different reasons. So can we reject the past? Maybe.

So can we erase the past? Not really near possibility!

While whispering to my soul some instincts tickled me to raise  my head and sniff in more oxygen. I was not suffocated nor was I an asthmatic patient, I was simply being natural within existence.

Neither was I an existentialist, I was simply relating to that raison d'etre!

I have been told one time in life that "jaw-jaw-is-better-than-war-war" I did share this with an unpalatable character but the character chose to crack the walls of reasoning without any convincing meaning! There and then war superseded law. There and then law was neither here nor there it was being twisted and turned to suit the size of a masked face.


Posted on Saturday, September 27, 2008 (Archive on Friday, October 10, 2008)
Posted by PNMBAI  Contributed by PNMBAI
Return

 
nba shoes zoom lebron vi nike zoom kobe 4 new lebron shoes nba basketball shoes on sale timberland boots uk NFL Jerseys